Sushil Kumar v. State

$~38 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1037/2018 SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Ms.Aishwarya Rao, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Iti Pandey, counsel for Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 11.04.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report not filed.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 24.03.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 304-II IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years with fine `9,000/- Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone five years, five months and twenty six days incarceration besides remission for one year, eleven months and twenty four days as on 23.03.2018. Earlier he was granted interim bail and there are no allegations of its misuse. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. W.P.(CRL) 1037/2018

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 5.

Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendant for information.

S.P.GARG, J.

APRIL 11, 2018 / sa W.P.(CRL) 1037/2018