Smt Shanti Devi v. Attar Singh & ORS

$-24 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ (i) CRL.M.C. 1307/2015 & Crl.M.A.4800/2015 Petitioner Mr. A.K. Panday, Mr. V.S. Dubey and Mr. Abhishek, Advocates SMT SHANTI DEVI Through:

versus ATTAR SINGH & ORS Through:

Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState + (ii) CRL.M.C. 1311/2015 & Crl.M.A.4806/2015 SMT SHANTI DEVI Petitioner Through:

Mr. A.K. Panday, Mr. V.S. Dubey and Mr. Abhishek, Advocates versus ATTAR SINGH & ORS Through:

Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

ORDER

06.04.2015 % In the above-captioned two petitions, the challenge is to the impugned orders vide which petitioners' application under Section 156

(3) of Cr.P.C. as well as the complaint has been dismissed by the courts below by holding that the dispute between the parties is essentially of CRL.M.C. 1307 & By:AMULYA

civil nature and the civil suit is already pending. Since the challenge to the impugned orders is on the common ground, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both these petitions were heard together and by this common order, they are being disposed of.

Upon hearing learned counsel for petitioners and on perusal of the impugned orders, I find no palpable error in the impugned orders. Accordingly, both these petitions are dismissed while making it clear that the dismissal of these petitions will not be taken as a reflection on merits in the pending civil suit.

The above captioned two petitions and the applications are accordingly disposed of.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE APRIL 06,2015 s CRL.M.C. 1307 & I31I of 2015