Badruddin v. State

$~28 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1043/2018 BADRUDDIN ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.S.K.Sethi, Advocate with Ms.Dolly Sharma, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Sushila, proxy counsel for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 01.06.2018 CRL.M.A.No. 11264/2018 (For reduction of surety amount) 1.

Vide order dated 11.04.2018, the petitioner was granted parole for a period of three weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. However, the petitioner could not furnish the required surety due to poverty and has remained in custody without availing the benefit of the said order. 2.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the surety amount is reduced from `25,000/- to `15,000/-. Other terms and conditions of the said order shall remain the same. 3.

The application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J JUNE 01, 2018 / tr