Manju Gupta v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited & ANR

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3505/2018, CM No. 13831/2018 MANJU GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv.

versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LIMITED & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Harsh Prakash, Adv. for R1 Mr. Nagmani Roy, Adv. for R2 with SPA Mr. Sanjay Goel

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 07.05.2018 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

"In view of the facts stated and submissions made hereinabove it is most respectfully prayed to this Hon'ble Court that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:

A.

Issue a writ, order or direction thereby commanding / directing the respondent No.1 to install separate connection at the subject premises i.e. First Floor of K2/1, Model Town-II, New Delhi-110009, against Request No.002011444425, in the name of petitioner;

B.

Award the cost of the proceedings in favour of petitioner and against the respondents;

C.

Pass such other or further order(s) those this Hon'ble Court may deem and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

Respondent No.2 has been served and represented through his counsel.

After hearing counsel for the parties for sometime, it is agreed between the petitioner and the respondent No.2 that the respondent No.2 shall apply for a fresh connection within three days for the first floor of property No. K-2/1, Model Town-II, New Delhi with the respondent No.1 by following necessary commercial formalities. If that be so, on such application, the respondent No.1 shall grant the connection to the first floor of the property as referred above.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 states, there would not be any interruption in the electricity at the first floor of the property. The learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the petitioner shall continue to pay the electricity bills for consumption of electricity in future. The statements are taken on record.

It is made clear that the aforesaid is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in CS No. 537852/2016 pending in the Rohini Court. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed itself, with regard to the title of the property in question. The petition is disposed of.

CM No. 13831/2018 Dismissed as infructuous.

Dasti to both the parties under the signature of the Court Master. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MAY 07, 2018/aky