Parveen Banu v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3626/2014 PARVEEN BANU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Sushant Sharma, Advocate for Ms.Shradha Karol, Amicus Curiae, (Advocate) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Atul Kumar, SHO, Mehrauli & Inspector Vikramjeet, SHO, Madhu Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 09.11.2017 Today the matter was fixed for arguments on petition for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali. Status report dated 05.11.2017 has already been filed. In the status report, Inspector Atul Kumar, SHO PS-Mehrauli has tendered his unconditional apology for the submission of incorrect facts by the then SHO PS-Mehrauli and undertaken to be more careful in future. Arguments heard.

It is submitted by learned APP for the State that respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali was granted interim bail by the Trial Court on 07.05.2013 for a period of two months. It is further submitted by learned APP for State that vide order dated 08.06.2017, the respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali has been granted regular bail by the Trial Court. CRL.M.C. 3626/2014

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant for cancellation of interim bail granted to respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali. However, it has been revealed from the order dated 08.06.2017 that the Trial Court has granted regular bail to respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali. In view of above, since the respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali has been granted regular bail by the Trial Court, the present petition challenging the cancellation of interim bail has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J NOVEMBER 09, 2017 rd CRL.M.C. 3626/2014