Rajesh Kumar & ANR v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

"1 $-5 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1819/2018 MD ERAQ & ANR Petitioners Through:

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. along with petitioners in person.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR, Respondents Through:

Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Maninder Maan, P.S. Vijay Vihar.

Respondent no.2 in person.

AND W.P.(CRL) 1073/2018 RAJESH KUMAR & ANR Petitioners Through:

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. along with petitioners in person.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Through:

Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with Ms. Iti Pandey, Adv. along with SI Maninder Maan, P.S. Vijay Vihar.

Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 23.04.2018 By these petitions, it is prayed that following cross FIRs may be quashed in view of the compromise :- a) FIR No. 725/2016 under Sections 308/34 IPG registered at police station Vijay Vihar on the complaint of Rajesh (respondent no.2/complainant in Crl. M.C. 1819/2018 and petitioner no.l/accused in W.P. (Crl.) 1073/2018); By:AMULYA

b) FIR No. 726/2016 under Sections 308/34 IPG registered at police station Vijay Vihar on the complaint of Mohd Eraq @ Riyaz (respondent no. 2/complainant in W.P. (Crl.) 1073/2018 and petitioner no.l/accused in Crl. M.C. 1819/2018). Mohd Eraq @ Riyaz and Rajesh (complainants) are present in Court along with their respective counsel and have been identified by 81 Maninder Maan of police station Vijay Vihar. Other accused/victims, namely, Dinesh Kumar, Mohd. Rashid and Archina Mishra are also present in Court and f have been identified by 81 Maninder Maan.

^ All the above-named persons submit that they have amicably settled their disputes vide two separate Compromise Deeds both dated 20^*^ January, 2018, therefore, they have no objection in case their respective FlRs are quashed. Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the accused persons and complainants voluntarily, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FlRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

APRIL 23, 2018 ga