Chandan v. State (NCT Of Dlehi)

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 825/2018 CHANDAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Utkarsh and Ms. Anshu Priyanka, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with Insp. Gajender Singh

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 31.10.2018 The counsel for the petitioner submits that he refuses to file a copy of the order framing charge in terms of the directions in the last order. His submissions on the last date were that no case is made out. The fact that charge has been framed and the case is at the stage of trial itself shows that the submissions cannot be accepted. The competent court of criminal jurisdiction has found sufficient material to put the petitioner on trial on charge for offences punishable under Sections 304B, 498A, 34 IPC. The refusal to place on record copy of the proceedings which are germane to the issue raised itself is a good ground to dismiss the bail application.

Dismissed.

R.K.GAUBA, J OCTOBER 31, 2018 yg