← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/19457/2025

Shri Ram Prakash (Now Deceased) Through Legal Heirs (Three Sons) (I). Mr. Sohan Lal Kanwar & ORS. v. Punjab And Sind Bank & ORS.

2025-12-22Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal2 pages

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 19457/2025, CM APPL. 81141/2025 (Stay) & CM APPL. 81142/2025 (Ex.) SHRI RAM PRAKASH (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS (THREE SONS) (I). MR. SOHAN LAL KANWAR & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Ms.

Sudha Varshney, Mr.

Ankush Sharma and Mr.

Shresth Varshney, Advocates along with LRs of Petitioner No. 1.

versus PUNJAB AND SIND BANK & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025 1.

The present Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the Order dated 10.11.2025, passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-II ["DRTII"], Delhi. 2.

Admittedly, a statutory Appeal against the Impugned Order is maintainable before the learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal ["DRAT"].

3.

Learned DRT-II has only refused to send the alleged sale deed dated 26.07.2002 to Central Forensic Science Laboratory ["CFSL"] for opinion.

4.

The Petitioner alleges that the said sale deed in question is a The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 13:13:56

fake document.

5.

CFSL can only give an opinion which is not binding on the Court and it is for the Petitioner to prove his allegations. 6.

After the Chairperson of learned DRAT, Delhi demitted the office, Chairperson, learned DRAT, Kolkata has been given additional charge.

7.

Hence, the Petitioner has an effective alternative remedy. 8.

Consequently, this Court is not inclined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and finds no ground to interfere with the Impugned Order. 9.

Accordingly, the present Writ Petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

DECEMBER 22, 2025/tk/kr/dj The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 13:13:56