R.K.Saraf v. Union Of India & ANR.

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5345/2011 & CM Appl. 10874/2011 R.K.SARAF ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. for UOI

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 16.02.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a discharge on the ground that he is not receiving any instructions from the petitioner. He further states that he had sent prior intimation of seeking discharge to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the counsel for the petitioner is discharged.

Since none is present for the petitioner despite notice for discharge, the present writ petition and pending application are dismissed in default and on account of non-prosecution. MANMOHAN, J FEBRUARY 16, 2016 NG