Raju v. State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi)

$~41 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 498/2017 & Crl. M.A. no. 4714/2017 RAJU ..... Petitioner Through :Mr.

M.

Rais Farooqui and Mr.

Rahbar Zaidi, Advs.

versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through :Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP with ASI Om Parkash, P.S. Welcome

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 20.03.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated. FIR was registered in the year 2015, but no action was taken by the police against the petitioner despite the fact that petitioner remained present in his house. Petitioner's sister was kidnapped by the complainant and her co-accused, for which FIR was got registered by the sister of the petitioner.

Learned APP has opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner. It is contended that petitioner has been specifically named in the FIR as the person, who raped the complainant. It is further contended that complainant has alleged that rape was done by pointing a gun at her. Petitioner is

evading his arrest since 2015. Proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. have been initiated against the petitioner.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as narrated above, petitioner has failed to make out a case for grant of anticipatory bail to him.

Bail application is dismissed. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

MARCH 20, 2017 rb