High Court of DelhiCRL.REV.P./346/2012

Karthik Meyyappan & ORS v. State & ANR

2017-02-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~24 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 346/2012 & Crl.M.A.7974/2012 KARTHIK MEYYAPPAN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through :

Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv.

versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through :

Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for R-1 with Inspector Vijay Pal Dahiya PS R K Puram.

Mohd. Sharique Khan, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 23.02.2017 Crl.M.A.3215/2017 (u/S 482 Cr.P.C. by Mr. Saravan Sekar, son of respondent no.2) It is submitted that respondent no.2 has died. He has left behind three legal heirs namely Mr. T. Saravan Sekar (son), Ms. Indra Murugan (wife) and Ms. Kiran Preethi (daughter). It is submitted that Ms. Kiran Preethi and Ms. Indra Murugan have executed separate special power of attorney(s), both dated 7th January, 2017. It is further submitted that matter has been settled between petitioners and the legal heirs of Late Shri T. K. Murugan vide compromise deed dated 12th January, 2017. It has been prayed that photocopies of these documents may be take on record. Application has not been opposed and is allowed.

Photocopies of documents are taken on

record.

Legal heirs of Late Shri T. K. Murugan are also impleaded as respondent nos.2(a), 2(b) & 2(c).

Application is disposed of in the above terms. CRL.REV.P. 346/2012 Amended memo of parties be filed during the course of the day. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2 (a) to 2(c), on instructions, submits that they have no objection in case FIR No.377/2009 under Sections 420/468/471/34 IPC registered at police station R. K. Puram and consequent proceedings pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate are quashed. In view of the compromise arrived at between the petitioners and respondent nos.2(a) to 2(c), the FIR No.377/2009 under Sections 420/468/471/34 IPC registered at police station R. K. Puram and consequent proceedings pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 23, 2017/dk