Imran v. State

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IMRAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.S.B. Dandapani, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.Kamna Vohra, A.S.C. for the State with SI Rajender Singh, PS Nang Nagri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 30.05.2016 1.

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner from jail seeking parole for a period of three months on the ground to search for a suitable match for himself and to re-connect social ties with his family and society. 2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner had made representation to the Respondent/State praying for grant of parole which has been rejected by the Respondent vide order No.F.18/36/2013/HG/5476 dated 04.11.2015.

3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the petitioner is seeking parole for maintaining social ties and as per Parole/Furlough Guidelines 2010, one of the objectives of framing the said guidelines was 'to protect social ties'. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of parole to the Petitioner to enable him to reconnect social ties with his family and society.

4.

On behalf of State, it is submitted that appropriate order may be passed keeping in view Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010 issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. 5.

In the nominal roll, the overall jail conduct of the Petitioner as well as his jail conduct in last one year is mentioned as 'Satisfactory'. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, the prayer for grant of parole is allowed to the extent that the Petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:- (i) Since the petitioner is a resident of H.No.309, 2nd Floor, GDA Flats, Tulsi Niketan, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, U.P., he shall keep the SHO/Duty Officer, P.S. Nand Nagri, Delhi about his place of residence in Delhi as well as his place of residence in his native town and his contact numbers i.e., mobile, landline or both. He shall further inform the SHO/Duty Officer, P.S. Nand Nagri, Delhi as to the period for which he shall be staying in his native town. It would be open to the concerned SHO to verify the address and the contact numbers and to seek cancellation of parole in case it is found to be incorrect.

(ii) The petitioner shall report on every Monday at 11 AM to the Duty Officer of the concerned Police Station/Police post under the jurisdiction of which, the petitioner shall stay during the period of parole in his native town.

(iii) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall not try to contact the witnesses in any manner whatsoever.

(iv) While submitting the bail bond, he will furnish to the Jail Superintendent the address of the place where he would reside in Delhi during the period of parole as well as the contact numbers. 7.

It is, however, made clear that on expiry of the parole period, the Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, who shall submit the surrender report to this Court. 8.

Writ Petition stands allowed in the above terms. 9.

The Petitioner be informed through the Jail Superintendent about the order passed.

Order dasti.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 30, 2016 'hkaur/da'