← Library
High Court of DelhiCS(OS)/88/2025

Amar Nath Sharma v. Sushma Sharma And ORS

2026-05-28Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mini Pushkarna5 pages

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 88/2025 & I.A. No. 3878/2025 AMAR NATH SHARMA .....Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Mohit Mittal, Advocate.

versus SUSHMA SHARMA AND ORS .....Defendants Through:

Mr. Rishabh Singh, Advocate for defendant nos.1 to 3.

Mr. Rishab Rajjain, Advocate for defendant no. 4 and 5.

(M): 9811079695 Email: rishab@rrjassociates.com Mr. Deepanshu, Advocate for defendant no. 6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 29.05.2026 This Case is being taken up today as 28th May, 2026 was declared as a holiday on account of 'Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid)'.

1.

The present suit has been filed seeking declaration, partition and permanent injunction with respect to the properties bearing no. F-105, Vikas Puri, New Delhi, and Flat No.7, Devdoot Apartment, DDA SFS Flats, D Block, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018 ("suit properties"). 2.

As per the case of plaintiff, Late Sh. T N Sharma and Late Smt. Leela Devi Sharma, being the parents of the plaintiff and defendant nos. 4 to 6, died intestate. All the parties, i.e., the plaintiff and the defendants are related to each other, and are in possession of the aforenoted suit properties. 3.

During the course of the proceedings, the parties made a joint request The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

to refer the matter for mediation.

4.

This Court notes that a Settlement Agreement dated 04th May, 2026 has been placed on record, as per which, the parties have settled their disputes.

5.

Learned counsels appearing for the parties jointly submit that the parties have voluntarily entered into the said Settlement Agreement, and that the parties have given their free consent and executed the aforesaid Settlement Agreement without any force, coercion, undue influence or misrepresentation. Accordingly, they submit that the present suit be decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement.

6.

This Court has perused the terms of the Settlement Agreement, wherein, it has clearly been stipulated as under: "xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx"

7.

Perusal of the aforementioned Settlement Agreement shows that the same is lawful and the Court finds no impediment in accepting the same. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

8.

Therefore, with the consent of the parties, a consent/compromise decree is hereby passed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 04th May, 2026, and the following directions are issued in this regard: i.

The parties are held bound by the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement, and they shall abide by the terms and conditions, as set out therein.

ii.

None of the parties shall raise any dispute with respect to the issues which have been settled by way of the Settlement Agreement dated 04th May, 2026.

9.

Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement between the parties, which shall form part of the decree. 10.

Let the decree sheet be prepared by the Registry, in accordance with the aforesaid terms between the parties.

11.

With the aforesaid directions, the present suit along with pending applications, is accordingly disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J MAY 29, 2026 c The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.