Hemant Jain v. Google India Pvt Ltd & ORS

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 1994/2014 HEMANT JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Rakesh C. Agrawal, Advocate.

(M:9891903838) versus GOOGLE INDIA PVT LTD & ORS.

..... Defendants Through:

Mr. Priyadarshi Banerjee, Mr. Nithin Pavuluri and Mr. Madhavam Sharma, Advocates for D-1 (M:8930133106) Mr. Neel Mason, Ms.Ridhima Pabi, Ms. Sanyukta Banerjee and Mr.

Shivang Sharma, Advocates for D-3 (M:9999052646)

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 05.09.2018 I.A. 3426/2018 in CS (OS) 1994/2014 Copy of the rejoinder filed by the Plaintiff is returned to the Plaintiff as it contains the name of a POCSO victim. Learned counsel for Plaintiff to place on record the entire pleadings and documents of the suit filed by the Plaintiff in the Karkardooma Court being CS No.537/2014. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff to also file reply to the application under Order I Rule 10 CPC, which would elaborate as to in what manner the Defendants are liable in the present suit. Upon filing of the documents and pleadings, as directed above, the application for the restoration of the suit shall be considered. Rejoinder be filed after deleting the name of the POCSO victim. List on 26th October, 2018.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

SEPTEMBER 05, 2018/dk