Amit @Nitu v. State (NCT Of Delhi)
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 4333/2025 AMIT @NITU .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Siddharth Yadav & Mr.
Anmol Kumar Pandey, Advs.
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through:
Mr.
Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 29.12.2025 1.
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking an extension of parole for a period of four (4) weeks.
2.
The Petitioner was granted parole vide Order dated 15.12.2025 for a period of two weeks, which would expire on 01.01.2026. 3.
A perusal of the Nominal Roll of the Petitioner would reflect that his conduct has been satisfactory. This Court also considers that the Petitioner has been granted furlough in the past on various occasions by the Director General of Prisons. 4.
Accordingly, the parole of the Petitioner is hereby extended for a period of two weeks from 01.01.2026 on the same terms and conditions as directed in the Order dated 15.12.2025. The said conditions are reproduced hereinunder:
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2025 at 14:55:49
1.
"That he/she shall furnish one surety of Rs. 4,000/-(Rupees Four Thousand Only) along with a personal bond in the like amount for his/her release on parole to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent concerned and the same surety and personal bond shall be valid to cover the extended period of parole (if any) granted by the competent authority.
2.
That he/she shall maintain peace and good behavior during his/her period of release on parole and will neither associate with bad characters nor lead a dissolute life.
3.
That he/she shall remain at the address mentioned in the application during the period of his release on parole. 4.
That his/her release on parole is valid for the abovementioned period or till he/she becomes liable to be detained in some other case, whichever is earlier.
5.
That he/she shall report at least once in a week to the Police Station within the prescribed limits in which his ordinary place of residence falls during the period of his release on parole or its extended period, if any.
6.
That he/she shall surrender immediately to the Jail Superintendent concerned, on the expiry of his/her period of release on parole as granted or on recalled.
7.
The convict may be released only after surrender of any of the other co-accused in above FIR, who is on parole, if any. 8.
This parole granting order shall be valid for a period of three months from the date of issue.
9.
The parole granted subsequently to a co-convict shall be made operative only after the date of expiry of this order of surrender of the convict already on parole, whichever comes earlier.
10.
That the prisoner will be liable to be recalled immediately to prison in case he violates any of the conditions, herein mentioned.
11.
In case, any parole order has been passed in favor of any co-accused, this order shall be operative only from the date when the order of the first convict ceases to operate or of his surrender, in case he was released on the parole."
5.
In the aforesaid terms, the present petition is disposed of. 6.
A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent forthwith for necessary information and compliance. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR (VACATION JUDGE) DECEMBER 29, 2025/ v/va The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2025 at 14:55:49