Anand Kumar v. State

$~34 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 808/2016 ANAND KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Sarvesh Singh, Advocate with Mr.K.K.Singh, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Amit Gupta, APP.

SI Rajeev.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 22.04.2016 1.

The petitioner seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.713/2015 registered under Section 420 IPC at PS Badarpur. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. During the course of arguments, on instructions, petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner was ready to pay `2 lacs to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any) within a month.

The petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2015.

Upon completion of investigation, a charge-sheet has already been filed.

BAIL APPLN. 808/2016

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner's offer to pay `2 lacs (the alleged cheated amount) to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any) within a month, he is admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. He shall pay `2 lacs to complainant within a month through Investigating Officer by way of Demand Draft. In case of non-compliance, the complainant / State will be at liberty to approach this Court.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J APRIL 22, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 808/2016