Raja Babu v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ORS.

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 13/2026 with CM APPL. 28/2026 and CM APPL. 29/2026 RAJA BABU .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Om Srivastava, Advocate.

versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocate for R1/MCD.

Mr.

Himanshu Kaushik, Mr.

Rupender Sharma and Mr. Aaransh Pathak, Advocates for R-2.

Mr. Saifi Ahmad, Advocate for R-3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 05.01.2026 1.

Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1/MCD submits that there is a mismatch between the photographs filed with the petition as well as the complaints which are annexed with the petition. He submits that the complaints refer to property no. E-112, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, whereas the photographs are in respect of House No. E-192. 2.

Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 on advance notice submits that respondent no.3 is the owner and occupier of property No.E192 and not E-112. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with W.P.(C) 13/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:19:30

liberty to take steps in accordance with law. 4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

5.

All pending applications stand disposed of.

AMIT BANSAL, J JANUARY 5, 2026 Vivek/- W.P.(C) 13/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:19:30