Vikas Gumber v. Commissioner Of Cgst, Anti Evasion Branch, Delhi East

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 11/2026, CRL.M.A. 136/2026 VIKAS GUMBER .....Applicant Through:

Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. Sambhav Jain and Mr. Pranav Roy Singh, Advocates.

versus COMMISSIONER OF CGST, ANTI EVASION BRANCH, DELHI EAST .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms.

Shelly Dixit, Advocate for CGST

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 05.01.2026 1.

By virtue of the present bail application, the applicant seeks following reliefs:

"(i) Set aside / quash the impugned order dated 13.12.2025 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Bail Matter No. 2152/25, whereby the Applicant's regular bail application was rejected.

(ii) Enlarge the Applicant on regular bail in connection with File No. GEXCOM/AE/MISC/1330/2022/Pt-3-AE arising out of alleged offences under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on such terms and conditions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper;

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 11:56:27

(iii) Pending disposal of the present bail application, direct that the Applicant be provided immediate and continuous specialised medical treatment, including evaluation and follow-up at AIIMS, New Delhi (including the scheduled follow-up on 24.12.2025) and/or any other tertiary care hospital as recommended by the treating doctors, and further direct that the Applicant be kept under strict medical supervision/ isolation as required for a liver transplant recipient;

(iv) Pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in order to secure the ends of justice."

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent, appearing on advance notice, submits that the applicant in the present application as also in the affidavit therein has wrongly averred that the applicant is in custody since 03.10.2025, despite the fact that he was granted interim bail on 06.10.2025 and again on 07.11.2025.

3.

Considering the same is an inadvertent typographical error, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to file the same afresh with modified affidavit. 4.

Accordingly, the present bail application alongwith the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J JANUARY 5, 2026/So The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 11:56:27