← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/3845/2018

Gajab Singh v. Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS.

2019-01-25Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula2 pages

$~19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 3845/2018 GAJAB SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Advocate.

versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B.

Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar, Advocate for UOI.

Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Advocate for R3/DDA.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 25.01.2019

1. The prayer in this petition reads as under: "a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction in the like nature thereby directing the respondents to pay suitable compensation in respect of acquired land of bearing Khasra No.l etc.120mini(03-09) , l/120min (03-06), 1/102 (0216) total land measuring 12 Big ha . The petitioner is having entitled 1/12th share i.e. 01 Bigha , Situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Ziouddinpur, Shahdra, Delhi- arising out of Award No.l 954 dated 27/02/1967 . In view of the provisions of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

b) To pay all benefits/alternative plots/ industrial plot DDA flat etc. admissible under the law in view of the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

2. According to the narration in the petition, the notification under Section 4 and a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ('LAA') was issued on 1st August 1966. The impugned Award No. 1954 was passed way back on 27th February 1967. There is no explanation in the petition for the inordinate delay in approaching this Court for relief.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition properly explaining the inordinate delay in approaching the Court for relief.

4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. S. MURALIDHAR, J.

SANJEEV NARULA, J.

JANUARY 25, 2019 ss