Mohinder Sharma v. State

73# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1216/2018 MOHINDER SHARMA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Kartickay Mathur, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for State, Ms.

Shikha Mehra and Ms. Sushila, Advocates with SI Jeetendra Singh, PS Subhash Place.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 23.04.2018 1.

By this petition the petitioner seeks furlough and also challenges the order dated 27th March, 2018 rejecting the application of the petitioner for grant of furlough.

2.

A perusal of the nominal roll reveals that the petitioner has been awarded jail punishments in the year 2012, 2014, 2015 (thrice), 2016 and 2017. Furlough is a reward of good behaviour in Jail and considering that there have been jail punishments awarded to the petitioner, this Court finds no error in the impugned order dated 27th March, 2018 rejecting the application seeking furlough by the petitioner on the ground that his unsatisfactory jail conduct.

3.

Petition is dismissed.

W.P.(CRL) 1216/2018

4.

Copy of the order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Mandoli Jail.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

APRIL 23, 2018 'vn'

W.P.(CRL) 1216/2018