← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./968/2026

Vikash Tati And Anrs v. The State NCT Of Delhi And Anrs

2026-05-07Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma3 pages

$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 968/2026 VIKASH TATI AND ANR.

....Petitioners Through:

Mr. A.K. Dey, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State Mr. Sonu Singh, Advocate for R-2 to R-7 alongwith respondents in person (18) + CRL.M.C. 1273/2026 IRFAN ALI AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Sonu Singh, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State Mr. A.K. Dey, Advocate for R-2 to R5 alongwith respondents in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 07.05.2026 1.

By way of these petitions, the petitioners seek quashing of two FIRs, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

i.e. FIR bearing no. 621/2023, registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 354/354A/354B/506/509/341/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC‟) and FIR bearing no. 622/2023, registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar, New Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 308/323/341/354B/452/174/34 of the IPC. 2.

The petitioners and respondents are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Kanjhawala, Delhi.

3.

Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the allegations in the aforementioned FIRs, which have been taken together, arise out of some misunderstandings and a sudden quarrel, subsequent to which cross FIRs were registered on their complaints against the petitioners under the relevant sections. However, it is stated that both the parties have amicably settled the present matter vide Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement Deed dated 05.11.2025, entered between them.

4.

On a query made by this Court, respondents, who have been identified by the concerned IO, have categorically stated that they have entered into compromise out of their own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by the respondents that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and that they have no objection, if these FIRs are quashed.

5.

In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

to quash the abovementioned FIRs and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIRs in question. 6.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 621/2023, registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 354/354A/354B/506/509/341/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC‟) and FIR bearing no. 622/2023, registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar, New Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 308/323/341/354B/452/174/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

7.

In view of the above, the present petitions stand disposed of. 8.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 07, 2026/ns/GJ The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.