Lovely Salhotra v. Aman Chitkara
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1280/2016 LOVELY SALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. R K Singh Yadav, Adv with petitioner in person versus AMAN CHITKARA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Siddharth Pandit, Adv with respondent in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
% 04.12.2017 Through learned counsel for the parties, it has been submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and pursuant thereto, a demand draft bearing no.752997 dated 18.11.2017 for a sum of Rs.5,70,000/- drawn on Bank of Baroda (photocopy is on record as Ex. CW-1/B) in favour of the petitioner has been handed over to him in relation to CC 310/4/2015 and he has stated that he seeks no further action in relation to CC 310/4/15 and thus seeks withdrawal of Crl MC 1280/2016 seeking quashing of order dated 17.02.2016 in Crl Rev. No.55/2015 passed by Sp. Judge, CBI-II, Rohini and order dated 15.03.2016 in CC 310/4/15 passed by MM-03, North West, Rohini.
The petitioner undertakes to return the affidavit of the respondent which is in his possession in relation to CC 310/4/15 and
has stated that he has no further claim left against the respondent and he, thus, seeks to withdraw the Crl MC 1280/2016 seeking quashing of order dated 17.02.2016 in Crl Rev. No.55/2015 passed by Sp. Judge, CBI-II, Rohini and order dated 15.03.2016 in CC 310/4/15 passed by MM-03, North West, Rohini. He has submitted that he has made this statement voluntarily of his own accord without any duress, coercion or pressure from any quarter.
In view of the above, Crl MC 2180/2016 is dismissed as withdrawn.
ANU MALHOTRA, J DECEMBER 04, 2017 sm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
Item No. 42 Crl. M.C. 4009/2016 PARVEEN KUMAR & ORS. Vs. STATE & ANR.
4.12.2017 CW-2 STATEMENT OF MS. PADMINI, D/O LATE SH. RAM JEET AGED 31 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 2367, GALI MUNDE WALI, SADAR BAZAR, DELHI..
On S.A.
I have brought my original Aadhar Card, photocopy of the same is on record as Ex. CW2/A. (OSR). My affidavit bears my signatures at points A and B on Ex.CW-2/B.
A settlement has been arrived at between me and the petitioners namely Parveen Kumar, Rameshwar, Kamlesh, Vijayanti Mala, Rajni and Roshan Lal. Pursuant to the settlement arrived at between me and the petitioners for a total sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was to be paid to me by the petitioner of which a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- has been already received by me previously and the balance sum of Rs.1,50,000/- is to be paid to me after quashing of the FIR in terms of settlement dated 06.08.2016 in Execution No.380/2014, certified copy of order is on record as Ex. CW2/C. The marriage between me and the petitioner No.1 has since been dissolved vide a decree of divorce through mutual consent vide decree dated 04.05.2016 under Section 13 B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in HMA No.552/2016 of the Family Courts, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, which decree of divorce is Ex.CW2/D.
In view of the settlement arrived at between me and the petitioners, I do not seek any further action against the petitioners No.1 to 6 namely, Parveen Kumar, Rameshwar, Kamlesh, Vijayanti Mala, Rajni and Roshan
Lal in relation to FIR No.147/2010, under Sections 406/498A/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Sadar Bazar. I thus do not oppose the prayer made vide the present petition Crl.M.C. No.4009/2017 seeking quashing of FIR No.147/2010, under Sections 406/498A/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Sadar Bazar.
I have made this statement voluntarily of my own accord without any duress, coercion or pressure from any quarter. RO & AC ANU MALHOTRA, J 4.12.2017