Chiranji Lal v. State

$~20 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1096/2016 CHIRANJI LAL ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Mallika Parmar, Proxy counsel.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 23.05.2016 CRL.M.A.No.8460/2016 (For reduction of surety amount) 1.

Vide order dated 05.04.2016, the petitioner was granted parole for a period of three weeks from the date of release, on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. However, the petitioner could not furnish the required surety due to poverty and has remained in custody without availing the benefit of the said order.

2.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the surety amount is reduced from `25,000/- to `15,000/-. Other terms and conditions of the said order shall remain the same. 3.

The application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J MAY 23, 2016 / tr