Vijay Kumar v. State

$~12 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 901/2018 VIJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr Deepak Pathak and Mr Shailesh Kumar, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr Arun Kumar Sharma, Addl. PP for the State.

Insp. Anupam Bhushan, PS Bawana, Rohini.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 11.05.2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the Court is inclined to direct expeditious disposal, the petitioner shall not press his bail application for regular bail. He further submits that as per his information, only ten official prosecution witnesses are remaining to be examined.

2.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and also the petitioner has been incarcerated since 03.04.2016, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make an endeavour to conclude the recording of the evidence by 31.12.2018. 3.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks BAIL APPLN.901/2018

leave to withdraw the petition.

4.

The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid direction.

5.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MAY 11, 2018 'Sn'

BAIL APPLN.901/2018