Durga Dass Bansal & ANR v. State & ANR

jo $~9& 10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1156/2018 and CrI. M.A. No. 7033/2018 DURGA DASS BANSAL & ANR Petitioners Through;

Mr Mukesh Gupta and Mayank Ahuja, Advocates.

Durga Dass Bansal, petitioner in person.

versus STATE & ANR Respondents Through: Mr Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Ms Jyoti Babbar, Advocate.

SI Shekhar, PS Shalimar Bagh.

Ms Supriya Juneja and Ms Rimjhim Naudiyal, Advocates for R-2.

AND W.P.rCRLl 1266/2018 and CrI.M.A. No. 7669/2018 + MUKESH BANSAL & ANR Through:

Petitioners Mr Mukesh Gupta and Mayank Ahuja, Advocates.

Durga Dass Bansal, petitioner in person.

versus Respondents Mr Avi Singh, ASC for State with Mr Tanuj Bhadana, Advocates.

SI Shekhar, PS Shalimar Bagh.

Ms Supriya Juneja and Ms Rimjhim Naudiyal, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

% 15.11.2019 STATE & ANR Through:

After some arguments, learned ASC states that a chargesheet has been 1.

filed.

By:AMULYA

2.

In view of the above, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petitions, with liberty to agitate all contentions before the concerned Court.

3.

The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. All pending applications are also disposed of. 4.

All rights and contentions of the petitioners are reserved. 5.

It is fiirther clarified that if an application for exemption is filed, the same would be duly considered.

VIBHUBAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 15,2019 RK