Akhilesh v. State

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 861/2018 and Crl.M.A.7153-7154/2018 AKHILESH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Pramod K. Tiwary, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Rekha Mishra, Pul Prahlad Pur

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 03.07.2018 After some hearing the counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present bail petition and the applications filed therewith, though his request being that the prosecution be directed to ensure that the evidence of the prosecutrix is recorded without further delay. In the given facts and circumstances, it is hoped and expected that the State will take all measures to ensure that the statement of the prosecutrix is recorded expeditiously at an early date. Needless to add, the petitioner will be entitled to move fresh application before the court of Sessions after the deposition of the prosectrix has been recorded. The present bail petition and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.

Dasti.

R.K.GAUBA, J.

JULY 03, 2018/vk