Trade Union Joint Action Committee & ORS. v. UOI & ORS.

$~A-14&15 I *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

(Common Order) + W.P.(C) 6875/2007 AIR INDIA CABIN CREW ASSOCIATION Petitioner Through:

None versus UOI & ORS.

Respondents Through:

Ms.Maneesha Dhir and Ms.Geeta Sharma, Advocates for R-l/UOL Mr.H.S. Chandhoke and Mr.Rajan Ray, Advocates for R-4.

+ W.P.(C) 10330/2009 TRADE UNION JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE& ORS.

Petitioners Through:

Ms.ShivangiSingh,ProxyCounsel.

Versus

UOI & ORS.

Respondents Through:

Ms.ManeeshaDhirandMs.Geeta Sharma,Advocatesfor R-l/UOI.

Mr.H.S.Chandhokeand Mr.RajanRay, Advocates forR-5.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH %

ORDER

o/„ 10.09.2015 CM No. 18149/2015in WP(C16875/2007(for discharge) In the facts and circumstances explained in the application, Sh.PromodB. Agarwala,Advocateappearingfor the petitioneris discharged By:AMULYA

from the matter.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(Q Nos. 6875/2007 & 10330/2009 There is no representation for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.6875/2007.

Having heard the leaned counsel for the respondents and having perused the material available on record, we are of the opinion that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication on merits at this point of time.

Accordingly,both the writ petitionsare dismissed as infructuous. UV"

CHIEF JUSTICE SEPTEMBER10,IQlSlrb JAYANTNATH,J % •J