Maheshwar Nath v. All India Institute Of Medical Sciences & ANR

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6320/2016 MAHESHWAR NATH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Lata Prasad, Advocate versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anand K. Singh, Advocate for Mr.

R.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 06.01.2017 CM.APPL 47109/2016(delay in refilling) This is an application seeking condonation of 25 days delay in re-filing the review petition.

Notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing the review petition is condoned.

The application stands disposed of.

CM.APPL 47108/2016(delay in filling) This is an application seeking condonation of 31 days delay in filing the review petition.

Notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the review

petition is condoned.

The application stands disposed of.

Review Pet. 554/2016 Counsel for the review petitioner submits that in paragraph 2 of the judgment dated 22.07.2016 in the third line the Rule mentioned is Rule 19, whereas it should be Rule 16.

Notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. Counsel for the respondents has no objection to the correction of this typographical error. In paragraph 2 of the judgment dated 22.07.2016 in the third line, the Rule 19 shall be read as Rule 16. However, on the merits of the review petition, we find that no grounds are made out to entertain the review petition.

The review petition is dismissed.

G.S.SISTANI, J I.S. MEHTA, J JANUARY 06, 2017 pst