← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.REV.P./459/2014

Raman Kumar v. The State NCT Of Delhi & ANR

2016-08-10Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$-37 to 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 459/2014 & Crl.M.A. 12285/2014 (Stay) RAMAN KUMAR Petitioner Through :

Petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through :

Ms. Neelam Sharma,APP for R-1.

Mr. Sandeep Das and Ms. Mehak Khurana, Advs. for R-2.

+ CRL.REV.P. 461/2014 & Crl.M.A. 12309/2014 (Stay) RAMAN KUMAR Petitioner Through :

Petitioner in person.

I versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through :

Ms. Neelam Sharma,APP for R-1.

Mr. Sandeep Das and Ms. Mehalc Khurana, Advs. for R-2.

+ CRL.REV.P. 462/2014 & Crl.M.A. 12311/2014 (Stay) RAMAN KUMAR Petitioner Through :

Petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through :

Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for R-1.

Mr. Sandeep Das and Ms. Mehak Khurana, Advs. for R-2.

+ CRL.REV.P. 463/2014 & Crl.M.A.12313/2014 (Stay) RAMAN KUMAR Petitioner Through :

Petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through :

Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for R-1.

Mr. Sandeep Das and Ms. Mehak Khurana, Advs. for R-2.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

% I + CRL.REV.P. 464/2014 & Crl.MA. 12315/2014 (Stay) RAMAN KUMAR Petitioner Through :

Petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through:

Ms. KusumDhalla,APP for R-1.

Ml-. SandeepDas andMs. Mehak Khurana, Advs. for R-2.

v AND + CRL.REV.P. 465/2014 & Crl.M.A. 12317/2014 (Stay) RAMAN KUMAR Petitioner Through :

Petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through:

Ms.NeelamSharma,APPforR-1.

Mr. Sandeep Das and Ms. Mehak Khurana, Advs. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK ^

ORDER

% 10.08.2016 Petitioner and learned counsel for respondent no.2 submit that the disputesbetweenthe petitionerand respondentno.2 have beenresolved/settled before the Mediation Centre. Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the revision petitions,inviewofthe settlementarrivedatbetweenthe parties. Petitionsare disposedof as withdrawn. Miscellaneousapplicationsare disposed of as infhictuous.

A.K. MTHAK, J.

AUGUST 10,2016/dk