Rupa Bhattacharya & ANR v. Sho C R Park Police Station & ORS

$~34 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4086/2018 & CM Nos. 16061/2018 & 21785/2018 RUPA BHATTACHARYA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

None.

versus SHO C R PARK POLICE STATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr Rakesh Sharma, Advocate for R2.

Mr Dibyadyuti Banerjee, Advocate for R-3.

Mr Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Mr Premsagar Pal and Mr Vikash Saini, Advocates for GNCTD.

SI Anil Kumar, PS C. R. Park.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 23.08.2018 1.

None appears for the petitioner.

2.

The status report has been filed on behalf of respondent no.2 (SDM) wherein it has been unequivocally stated that no damage has been noticed in respect of the property of the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3 (Mr Jatav Dey, the builder) states that the excavation in the property in question is almost complete and a JCB is not being used. 3.

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution as well as on the basis of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent no.3. The pending applications are also disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J AUGUST 23, 2018/MK