Union Of India v. Khetrabasi Biswal & ANR

to $~14& 15.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6016/2014 UNIONPUBLICSERVICECOMMISSION Petitioner Through:

Mr.NareshKaushikand Ms.AditiGupta, Advs.

versus KHETRABASIBISWAL&ANR Respondents Through:

Mr.G.K.Kaushik,Adv. for respondent no.l.

Ms.Sanjugeeta Moktan and Ms.Mahima Bahl,Advs. forMr.AkshayMakhija, CGSC, Adv. for UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 5891/2014 & CM APPL.NOS.14426-28/2014 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner Through:

Ms.SanjugeetaMoktanand Ms.Mahima Bahl,Advs. for Mr.AkshayMakhija, CGSC, Adv. for UOI.

versus "V KHETRABASIBISWAL&ANR Respondents Through:

Mr.G.K.Kaushik,Adv. for respondent no.l.

Mr.NareshKaushikand Ms.AditiGupta, Advs. for UPSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLEMS. JUSTICESANGITADHINGRASEHGAL

ORDER

% 02.12.2015 Both these writ petitionsassail a common order dated 27.2.2014passed by CentralAdministrativeTribunal.The standofboth the petitionersi.e. Union By:AMULYA

// ofIndiaand UnionPublicServiceCommissionis practicallythe same. After some hearing, it is agreed by counsel for the parties that, at this stage,W.P.(C)5891/2014may be disposedofwithleaveto thepetitionerto urge all grounds,as raised in the said writ petition,in W.P.(C)6016/2014in which UnionofIndiahas also beenarrayedas aparty.

Accordingly,as agreed, W.P.(C)5891/2014and all pendingapplications in W.P.(C)5891/2014standdisposedofwith leave as prayedfor. The Registry shall tag the file of W.P.(C)5891/2014along with W.P.(C)6016/2014.As agreed,the petitionershall rely upon the pleadingsof W.P.(C)5891/2014at the timeofhearingof W.P.(C)6016/2014.

List W.P.(C) 6016/2014 on 30.3.2016.

G.S.SISTANI, J GAL, J SANGIT DECEMBER 02,2015 msr W.P.(C)6016/2014& W.P.(C)5891/2014 2/2