Amit Paul v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4006/2018 & CM APPL. 15812/2018 AMIT PAUL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sai Prasanna Dash and Mr. Arpit Paliwal, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Gigi C. George, Adv. for R-1.

Mr. Amit Bansal and Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advocates for R-2.

Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Advocate for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 17.08.2018 It is submitted that the service tax payment demand for the impugned notice dated 01.03.2018 has since been withdrawn by the Competent Authority on 25.06.2018. It is also stated that subsequently show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. This development is confirmed by the counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances, the communication dated 25.06.2018 is hereby directed to be placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications stand disposed of.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J AUGUST 17, 2018 nn