Shri Suraj Bhan Bansal & ANR. v. Shri Naresh Kumar Gupta & ANR.

V;

$-2 and 3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 1631/2007 SHRI SURAJ BHAN BANSAL & ANR.

Plaintiffs Through:

Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate.

versus SHRI RAM GOYAL & ANR.

Defendants Through:

None.

+ CS(OS) 1635/2007 SHRI SURAJ BHAN BANSAL & ANR.

Plaintiffs Through:

Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate.

versus SHRI NARESH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.

Defendants Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA

ORDER

% 14.01.2016 1.

•Counsel for the plaintiffs states that suits have to be withdrawn in view of the settlement before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre.

2.

Ordinarily, I would not have pecuniary jurisdiction to decide the suits but since the suits are prayed to be withdrawn, I exercise my CS(OS)Nos.1631/2007& 1635/2007 By:AMULYA

powersunder Section24 of Code of CivilProcedure,1908 (CPC) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the suits are accordingly allowed to be withdrawn, as prayed.

3.

Since the suits are withdrawn before recording of evidence, plaintiffsin view of Section16-Aof the Court-feesAct, 1870 (as applicable to Delhi)are entitledto refundof 50% of the Courtfees. Registrywill issue the necessary certificate in favour of the plaintiffs. VALMIKIJ. MEHTA, J JANUARY 14, 2016 Ne CS(OS) Nos.1631/2007 & 1635/2007