← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4080/2018

Harminder Singh v. Union Of India And ORS.

2018-04-26Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher2 pages

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4080/2018 HARMINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Shailendra Singh with Ms. Rachita Garg, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.D.P. Bhardwaj with Mr. Kanishk Arora, Advs. for R1&2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 26.04.2018 CM Appl.16054/2018 (for exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) No.4080/2018 2.

Counsels are agreed that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the order dated 26.04.2018 passed in various writ petitions including W.P.(C) No.4190/2018, titled: Vijay Arora vs. Union of India. In sum, the petitioners seek to avail of the benefits of Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

3.

Counsel for the petitioner says that qua the subject company i.e., Parish Caterers Private Limited, he seeks application of directives contained in the aforementioned order.

4.

It is made clear that if there is any other company, apart from the one(s) mentioned in the caption writ petition, whose name has been struck off from the Register of Companies, resulting in the inclusion of the petitioners' names in the impugned list of disqualified directors, then, this

order will not come in the way of necessary consequences in law flowing from such circumstance.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the official respondents to apply the directives contained in Vijay Arora (Supra) 6.

It is made clear that the directions contained in aforementioned order will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner(s) herein. 7.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed. 8.

Dasti under signatures of the Court master.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J APRIL 26, 2018/ak