Aakansha v. Registrar General Delhi High Court

$~31.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3394/2016 AAKANSHA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.S. Ray, Ms. Sunil Kumar and Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Advocates.

versus REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Ms. Arpita, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 25.04.2016 CM No. 14482/2016 Exemption application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) No. 3394/2016 & CM No. 14481/2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to paragraph 12 of the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondent-Delhi High Court submits that the writ petition is belated and, therefore, should not be entertained. Taking the statement of the counsel for the petitioner on record, we

dismiss the present writ petition with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that it will be open to the respondents to raise the said objection or any other objection once a fresh writ petition is filed. SANJIV KHANNA, J.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

APRIL 25, 2016 VKR