Ram Parsad Bismil v. The State NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4807/2018 RAM PARSAD BISMIL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pandey with Mr. Manmohan, Advs.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC for R-2 & 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 07.05.2018 CM APP No. 18507-508/2018(exemptions) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 4807/2018 2.

Issue notice.

3.

Mr. Sameer Vashisht, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. Learned counsel states that he does not oppose the prayer made in the petition. The substantive prayer made in the petition is as follows:- "A. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/s in favor of the Petitioner and against the respondent no 2 and 3 whereby directing the respondent no 2 and 3 to make corrections in the revenue record by recording the name of the petitioner Sh. Shirya in the revenue record of land bearing Khasra Number 172/43 Khatauni no. 79/133 measuring (4-16) situated in the area of village Badar Pur Khadar Delhi-110094 and handed over to the petitioner, in the interest of justice." W.P.(C) 4807/2018

4.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that the present writ petition may be treated as a representation. It is further stated that the concerned SDM will grant a personal hearing to the petitioner qua which a written notice will be issued to the petitioner. Learned counsel says that the SDM will pass a speaking order within ten weeks from today.

5.

The said statement is taken on record. It is ordered accordingly. 6.

The concerned SDM will pass a speaking order after hearing the petitioner; a copy of which will be given to the petitioner. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the final determination rendered by the SDM, he will have liberty to assail the same in the manner known to law.

7.

Dasti.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J MAY 07, 2018/ak W.P.(C) 4807/2018