Nandke v. State (Gnct) Of Delhi

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + NANDKE .....Appellant Through:

Ms. Rakhi Dubey, DHCLSC with Ms.

Arpita Srivastava, Advocate alongwith Appellant in person.

versus STATE (GNCT) OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with Mr. Sunil Singh Rawat, Mr.

Arsala Naik, Mr. Siddharth Goyal and Ms. Astha Dhingra, Advocates along with SI Naresh Kr. Sharma, PSShahdara, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

O R D E R

% 04.12.2025 1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.

The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant - Nandke under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assailing the judgment of conviction dated 05th December, 2007 and the order on sentence and 11th December, 2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case bearing No. 290/2006 arising out of FIR bearing No.

339/2005 registered under Sections 363/328/365/366/376 IPC at Police Station Shahdara. 3.

The Appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 368/376 IPC.

4.

The Trial Court Record as well as the Nominal Roll of the Appellant has been perused.

5.

It is stated that the Appellant was released from jail on 08th June, 2011 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

after completing the sentence awarded to him. 6.

The Appellant has submitted that as he has already undergone the entire sentence awarded to him, and therefore he does not wish to press the present appeal, as the same has become infructuous.

7.

The Nominal Roll received from the concerned Jail Superintendent is reproduced hereunder:

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

8.

The Appellant has been identified in Court by SI Naresh Kumar, PS Shahdara. After questioning the Appellant, this Court is satisfied that he is making the statement with full understanding of its consequences, the same having been duly explained to him.

9.

Keeping in view the statement of the Appellant, which is taken on record, and considering the fact that the Appellant has already served the sentence awarded by the Trial Court, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 10.

Perusal of the connected appeal bearing CRL. A. 840/2008 shows that the e-copy of the Trial Court Record (TCR) has not been received in that appeal. The Registry is directed to place the e-copy of the TCR received in the present appeal in the connected appeal bearing no. CRL. A. 840/2008. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J DECEMBER 04, 2025/nd/abk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.