Mr. Vipin Chadha And ORS. v. Union Of India And ANR.

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4271/2018 MR. VIPIN CHADHA AND ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.P.K.Mittal, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 26.04.2018 CM APP No. 16677/2018 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 4271/2018 & CM APP No.16678/2018 2.

Issue notice. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.

3.

Counsels are agreed that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the order dated 20.04.2018 passed in various writ petitions including W.P.(C) No.3887/2018, titled: Prabuddha Choudhury vs. Registrar of Companies and Anr. In sum, the petitioners seek to revive the subject company i.e., RJ Developers Private Limited, by filing an appeal, if not already filed, before the NCLT under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013.

4.

Counsel for the petitioners says that qua the subject company, he seeks application of the directives contained in the aforementioned order,

insofar as it concerns the petitioners.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the official respondents to apply the directives contained in Prabuddha Choudhury (Supra).

6.

It is made clear that the directions contained in aforementioned order will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner(s) herein. 10.

It is made clear that if there is any other company, apart from the subject company mentioned above, whose name has been struck off from the Register of Companies, resulting in the inclusion of the petitioners' names in the impugned list of disqualified directors, then, this order will not come in the way of necessary consequences in law flowing from such circumstance.

7.

Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J APRIL 26, 2018 neelam