Jolly Oraon v. Pushu Oraon

$~4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 55/2016 & CM No.14459/2016 JOLLY ORAON ..... Appellant Represented by:

None versus PUSHU ORAON ..... Respondent Represented by:

Dr.M.P.Raju, Advocate with Mr.Jamesh P.Thomas, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 27.09.2016 1.

The appellant has suffered an ex-parte decree of divorce. 2.

Surprisingly the order dismissing appellant's application Under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure which has been filed along with the appeal has not been challenged.

3.

Be that as it may, since none appears for the appellant even at the second call, the appeal and CM No.14459/2016 are dismissed in default. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 'skb'