Mohd. Israr v. State

$~44 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1308/2018 MOHD. ISRAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Adit S.Pujari, Advocate with Ms.Tusharika Mottoo, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel.

SI Rohit Kumar, PS Jamia Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 01.05.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of two months. Status report filed. It is taken on record.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 23.04.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 302/34 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for life with fine `5,000/-. Crl.A.349/2016 was dismissed by this Court on 15.11.2017. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone five years and seven months incarceration besides remission for eight months and ten days as on 22.04.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. Earlier he was granted interim bail and there are no allegations of its misuse.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted two weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J MAY 01, 2018 / tr