Rajiv @ Diwanji v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1316/2018 RAJIV @ DIWANJI ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with SI Harpal Singh, PS Paharganj

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 15.05.2018 Aggrieved by a decision not being taken on the application of the petitioner seeking parole on the ground of medical treatment of his wife, the petitioner preferred the present petition.

Learned proxy counsel for the learned Additional Standing Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has since been granted parole vide order dated 27th April, 2018 which the petitioner has not availed till 5th May, 2018 but can avail the same.

No further orders are called for in the petition. Petition is disposed of.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MAY 15, 2018 mamta