Shruti Chopra v. Kapil Chorpa & ANR

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016 SHRUTI CHOPRA ..... Appellant Represented by:

Mr.Sumeet Anand & Mr.Sumit R.Sharma, Advocates versus KAPIL CHORPA & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr.S.K.Duggal & Mr.Vinod, Advocates for R-1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 09.08.2016 CM No.14732/2016 1.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing of the appeal is condoned.

2.

The application is disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016 1.

With consent of the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent No.1, the appeal is disposed of setting aside the impugned order dated August 26, 2015 which has closed appellant's right to file written statement. We grant appellant two weeks time from today to file the written statement subject to payment of cost in sum of `10,000/- to respondent No.1 for the inconvenience caused to respondent No.1.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016

2.

Served with summons in HMA No.401/14 in April, 2014 no written statement was filed till when the impugned order was passed. 3.

No costs.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

AUGUST 09, 2016/'pg'

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2016