Puran Singh @ Vipin v. State

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + PURAN SINGH @ VIPIN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Vikas Padora and Mr.Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Ashish Negi, Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, A.S.C. for the State with SI R.S. Pandit, PS Preet Vihar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 19.05.2016 1.

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner from jail seeking parole for a period for getting his son admitted in school as well as for reconnecting social ties with his family and society. 2.

Status report has been filed by the State.

3.

Heard.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking parole for getting his son admitted in Naveen model School, Sant Ravidas Nagar, Jahangir Puri. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from that, the petitioner also wants to maintain social ties with his family and society and as per Parole/Furlough Guidelines 2010, one of the objectives of framing the said guidelines was 'to protect social ties'. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of parole to the Petitioner.

5.

Status report has been filed by the State to the effect that during inquiry from Naveen model School, Sant Ravidas Nagar, Jahangir Puri, it was revealed that wife of the petitioner has applied for admission of his son Pratham in class LKG in that school and that admissions will be conducted in the said school till 20.07.2016.

6.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State, on instructions, submits that address of the petitioner has been verified. He further submits that since the petitioner wants to get his son admitted in Naveen model School, Sant Ravidas Nagar, Jahangir Puri, which fact has been duly verified from the said school, appropriate orders may be passed keeping in view the Parole/Furlough Guidelines - 2010 issued by Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

7.

As per nominal roll, the jail conduct of the Petitioner in last one year is mentioned as 'Satisfactory'.

8.

Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, the prayer for grant of parole is allowed to the extent that the Petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:- (i) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall report to the Duty Officer, P.S. Preet Vihar, Delhi on every Monday at 10 AM. (ii) The Petitioner shall keep the SHO, P.S. Preet Vihar, Delhi informed about his place of residence in Delhi and his contact numbers i.e. mobile, landline or both. It would be open to the concerned SHO to verify the address and the contact numbers and to seek cancellation of parole in case it

is found to be incorrect.

(iii) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall not cross the borders of Delhi.

(iv) During the period of parole, the petitioner shall not try to contact the witnesses in any manner whatsoever.

(v) While submitting the bail bond, he will furnish to the Jail Superintendent the address of the place where he would reside in Delhi during the period of parole as well as the contact numbers. 9.

It is, however, made clear that on expiry of the parole period, the Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, who shall submit the surrender report to this Court. 10.

Writ Petition stands allowed in the above terms. 11.

The Petitioner be informed through the Jail Superintendent about the order passed.

Order dasti.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 19, 2016 'st'