Manju v. State

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1394/2016 MANJU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Amit Kala, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.Srilina Roy, advocate for Ms.Nandita Rao, A.S.C. for the State with SI Bhanu Pratap, PS Mandir Marg.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 18.05.2016 1.

By filing the present writ petition from Jail, the petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months on the ground that she wants to spend some time with his only son during summer vacations and she also wants to inquire about the SLP filed by her husband on her behalf through legal aid. 2.

Notice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State accepts notice. 3.

Nominal roll of the petitioner has also been placed on record as per which the Petitioner has availed three weeks furlough in the recent past i.e. with effect from 29.01.2016 to 20.02.2016.

4.

As per Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010, a minimum period of six months ought to have elapsed from the date of termination of the previous parole/furlough.

W.P.(CRL) 1394/2016

5.

In the given facts and circumstances, the prayer of the Petitioner for releasing him on parole is hereby rejected.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

7.

Petitioner be informed through concerned Jail Superintendent about the orders passed.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 18, 2016 'st'

W.P.(CRL) 1394/2016