Prakash @ Kalu v. State

$~50 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1349/2018 PRAKASH @ KALU ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Pankaj Sinha, Advocate with Mr.Mukul Dev, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with SI Ankit Choudhary, PS Timarpur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 16.05.2018 CRL.M.A.No. 9401/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.A.No. 9400/2018 1.

Vide order dated 02.05.2018, the petitioner was granted parole for a period of three weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

However, the petitioner could not furnish the required surety due to poverty and has remained in custody without availing the benefit of the said order. 2.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the surety amount is reduced from `20,000/- to `15,000/-. Other terms and conditions of the said order shall remain the same.

3.

The application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J MAY 16, 2018 / tr