Abhishek Gupta v. National Stock Exchange Of India Limited And ORS.

'' vfi9 ''

$-66 to 68

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.p.rc) 468n/2nis ^ CM No. tS0l?/7ni « + ABHISHEKGUPTA .....PetitionerThrough:

None.

versus NATIONALSTOCKEXCHANGEOF INDIA LIMITEDAND ORS.

d j .

Respondents Through:

Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for NSEI/R-1.

Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil PChanna, Advocatesfor R-2.

WITH + W.P.(C) 469V2018 & CM No isn^7/->nt« SHASHANKGUPTA Through:

None.

versus iNATIONALSTOCKEXCHANGEOF INDIALIMITED ANDORS.

p , Respondents Through:

Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for NSEI/R-1.

Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil Khanna, Advocatesfor R-2.

AND W.p.rc) 47nn/20i8 & cm nq. isin.viois + MADHUGUPTA Through:

None.

By:AMULYA

versus NATIONALSTOCKEXCHANGEOF INDIA LIMITEDAND ORS.

Respondents Through;

Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil Khanna, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLEMR. JUSTICEVIBHUBAKHRU

ORDER

% 25.10.2018 1.

These petitionswere passedover as none had appearedon behalfof thepetitioners.Noneappearsfor the petitionerson the secondroundas well. It is noticed that none had appeared for the petitionerson the previous hearing(heldon 22.10.2018)as well.

2.

The learnedcounselappearingfor the respondentsfurtherstatesthat the petitionshave become infructuousas the amounts have already been disbursed.

3.

The petitions are dismissedin view of the statementmade by the learnedcounselappearingfor the respondentsas well as in default. 4.

The pendingapplicationsare alsodisposedof VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 25, 2018 MK