Md. Israr Qureshi v. State

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1365/2016 MD. ISRAR QURESHI ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Naomi Chandra, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC (Criminal) with Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa and Mr. Kranti Vikram Singh, Advocate and SI Shri Gopal, PS- Shakarpur

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 03.05.2016 The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is devoid of merit, inasmuch as, a perusal of the nominal roll qua the petitioner reveals that he had jumped interim bail when last released and had committed four similar offences at that time. Further, there are numerous other cases pending against the petitioner.

In view of the foregoing, I am in complete agreement with the order rendered by the competent authority dated 22.02.2016, rejecting the petitioner's representation for parole.

However, the Jail Superintendent, Tihar is directed to make all necessary arrangements so as to enable the petitioner to institute a Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, if he is so advised.

A copy of this order be sent to the Superintendent, Central Jail, Tihar for necessary compliance and communication of the same to the petitioner. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MAY 03, 2016 dn