← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4013/2016

Pankaj Chopra v. Union Of India & ORS.

2016-05-13Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru2 pages

$-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

* 9.

W.P.(C)4013/2016& CMNo.16936/2016 PANKAJCHOPRA petitioner Through.Mr SachinDatta, SeniorAdvocatewith Ms Nandadevi Deka and Ms Kanupriya, Advocates.

'

+ versus UNIONOF INDIA&ORS.

Respondents Through. Mr Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.1/UOI.

Ms Sonia Sharma, Senior Standing counsel for Respondent No.2./CBEC.

AND 10.

W.P.(C)4015/2016& CMNo.16939/2016 M/S SAMARTHDESIGNS(P) LTD, Petitioner Through. Mr SachinDatta, SeniorAdvocatewith Ms Nandadevi Deka and Ms Kanupriya, Advocates.

versus UNIONOF INDIA &ORS.

Respondents Through:

Ms Monika Arora, CGSC for Respondent No.1.

Ms Sonia Sharma, Senior Standing counsel for Respondent No.2./CBEC.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

"/o 13.05.2016 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

fr.P.fCJ4013 &4015 of2016

1. In lightofthe decisionofthis Courtdated 20"^ October2015 in CUSAA 19/2015 (AnjaniTechnoplastLtd. v. The CommissionerofCustoms)and the decisiondated 10^ May, 2016 in W.P(C)92112^15(RajdhaniFlora iSi InfrastructureDevelopersPvt. Ltd. v. UnionofIndia),the questionsraised in thesepetitionsconcerningthe interpretationofSection35 Fofthe Central ExciseAct 1944as amendedwitheffectfrom 6thAugust2014alreadystand answeredagainstthe Petitioners.Therefore,the Court declinesto entertain theprayersinthesepetitions.

2. The petitionsand the pendingapplicationsare dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY13,2016 VIBHUBAKHRU.J MK W.P.(C) 4013 &4015of2016