Kamlesh Prakash & ANR v. Suraj Prakash Singh

$~34.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 257/2014 and E.A. 168/2015 KAMLESH PRAKASH & ANR ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vineet Chaudhary and Mr. Saurav Roy, Advocates versus SURAJ PRAKASH SINGH ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Mukesh Vasta, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

O R D E R

% 19.03.2015 E.A. 238/2015 (by the Decree Holders u/S 151 CPC) 1.

Mr. Suhail Dutt, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Decree Holders states that the execution petition stands satisfied in terms of the orders dated 10.12.2014 and 24.12.2014. He submits that the case has been lingering thereafter only to enable all the parties to arrive at a comprehensive settlement by executing a partition deed between the Decree Holder No.2, her son, the Judgment Debtor and her daughter, Dr. Shweta Prakash, who is not a party in the present proceedings. It is stated that despite sincere efforts made by his client, neither the Judgment Debtor, nor Dr. Shweta Prakash have taken any step to execute the partition deed and therefore the EX.P. 257/2014

Decree Holders do not wish to keep the present petition pending any further.

2.

At this stage, learned counsel for the Judgment Debtor states that the Decree Holders have not furnished certified copies of the title documents of the Green Park property, in terms of the assurance given and recorded in the order dated 24.12.2014. 3.

Counsel for the Decree Holders states that needful shall be done within two days.

4.

Accordingly, the present application is allowed. The execution petition and the pending application are disposed of. HIMA KOHLI, J MARCH 19, 2015 rkb EX.P. 257/2014