Samay Puri v. The State ( NCT Of Delhi)

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 850/2016 SAMAY PURI ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.G.L.Soni, Advocate.

versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP.

Mr.Ankit Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 03.05.2017 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.303/2016 registered under Section 376 IPC at PS Uttam Nagar. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. By an order dated 27.04.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. The petitioner and the prosecutrix were acquainted with each other. Physical relations took place between the two on several occasions albeit on the alleged promise to marry. Additional status report BAIL APPLN. 850/2016

reveals that the alleged threats extended to the prosecutrix do not connect the petitioner.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J.

MAY 03, 2017 / tr BAIL APPLN. 850/2016